Sirin Software vs EPAM Systems: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Sirin Software (4.3/5) edges ahead of EPAM Systems (3.9/5) overall. Sirin Software is the better choice for device startups needing Linux firmware plus a companion app. EPAM Systems is the stronger option for fortune 500 firms adding IoT to enterprise systems. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Sirin Software vs EPAM Systems: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Sirin Software | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 1993 |
| HQ | Pompano Beach, Florida, USA (R&D in Kyiv and Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine) | Newtown, Pennsylvania, USA |
| Team size | 50–249 | 50,000+ |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Embedded Linux and SDK work for semiconductor companies, carried through to the consumer app | Publicly listed enterprise vendor that ties IoT data into large data and cloud estates |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price | Time and materials, dedicated team, managed services |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded Linux, Yocto, BLE | AWS, Azure, Google Cloud |
| Industries served | Consumer electronics, Semiconductors, Smart home, Agritech | Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Retail, Financial services, Energy |
Sirin Software vs EPAM Systems: overview
Sirin Software
Sirin Software is registered in Florida and does its engineering at R&D centres in Kyiv and Ivano-Frankivsk. It has worked since 2014 on embedded Linux, board support, SDKs and the mobile apps that pair with devices. A published Clutch review covers firmware for a smart hose timer that talks to Android and iOS apps and to AWS. The company is small; directory headcounts range from about 37 to 249 depending on the source.
EPAM Systems
EPAM was founded in 1993 and is headquartered in Newtown, Pennsylvania, with more than 50,000 staff. It is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and works mostly for large enterprises. Connected-product and industrial IoT work happens inside its broader engineering, data and cloud practices. Its scale and compliance are real advantages, but IoT apps are a narrow slice of what it does.
Services and capabilities: Sirin Software vs EPAM Systems
| Capability | Sirin Software | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile companion apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web dashboards and portals | ✗ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud back end | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded firmware | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware design | ✓ | ✗ |
| Edge AI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Sirin Software vs EPAM Systems
| Framework / platform | Sirin Software | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | N/A | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| BLE | ✓ | N/A |
| MQTT | N/A | N/A |
| Swift | N/A | N/A |
| Kotlin | N/A | N/A |
| Flutter | N/A | N/A |
| React Native | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Sirin Software vs EPAM Systems
| Criterion | Sirin Software | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time and materials, Team extension | Dedicated team, Time and materials, Managed services |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Sirin Software vs EPAM Systems
| Dimension | Sirin Software | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer electronics, Semiconductors, Smart home | Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Retail |
| Best use cases | Writing firmware and a companion app for a consumer smart garden or home device., Building SDKs and reference apps for a new chip or development board. | Connecting factory telemetry to an enterprise data platform., Building internal apps that use device data across a large company. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Dedicated team |
Sirin Software vs EPAM Systems: pros and cons
| Sirin Software | |
|---|---|
| + | Linux board bring-up and driver work are its main specialty |
| + | Can carry a single BLE or Wi-Fi device from firmware to the AWS back end and phone app |
| + | Ukrainian delivery keeps rates below US-based vendors |
| - | Small team, so it cannot staff a large multi-product programme |
| - | Headcount figures vary a lot between directories |
| - | Web dashboard and enterprise integration experience is thinner than its embedded work |
| EPAM Systems | |
|---|---|
| + | Public-company governance and financial reporting |
| + | Strong data engineering for analysing large telemetry volumes |
| + | Global delivery footprint |
| - | IoT app development is a small part of a broad enterprise portfolio |
| - | Little hardware or firmware work |
| - | Pricing and process are built for large enterprises and rarely fit startup budgets |
Who should choose Sirin Software?
A typical fit: writing firmware and a companion app for a consumer smart garden or home device.
Embedded Linux and SDK work for semiconductor companies, carried through to the consumer app. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Semiconductors, Smart home, Agritech.
Who should choose EPAM Systems?
A typical fit: connecting factory telemetry to an enterprise data platform.
Publicly listed enterprise vendor that ties IoT data into large data and cloud estates. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Retail, Financial services, Energy.
Decision matrix: Sirin Software vs EPAM Systems
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Sirin Software |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | EPAM Systems |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Sirin Software (Not published) vs EPAM Systems (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | EPAM Systems |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | EPAM Systems |
Use case fit: Sirin Software vs EPAM Systems
| Use case | Sirin Software fit | EPAM Systems fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Writing firmware and a companion app for a consumer smart garden or home device. | Strong | Limited | Sirin Software |
| Building SDKs and reference apps for a new chip or development board. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Connecting factory telemetry to an enterprise data platform. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Building internal apps that use device data across a large company. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price MVP app | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Long-term dedicated team | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Sirin Software vs EPAM Systems
Sirin Software (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT App Development projects. Embedded Linux and SDK work for semiconductor companies, carried through to the consumer app.
EPAM Systems (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need building internal apps that use device data across a large company. If your situation matches that, EPAM Systems is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Sirin Software vs EPAM Systems FAQ
Is Sirin Software better than EPAM Systems?
Sirin Software (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Sirin Software's strongest advantage: linux board bring-up and driver work are its main specialty. EPAM Systems's strongest advantage: public-company governance and financial reporting.
How do Sirin Software and EPAM Systems differ in pricing?
Sirin Software uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. EPAM Systems uses time and materials, dedicated team, managed services pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Sirin Software or EPAM Systems?
Sirin Software is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Sirin Software and EPAM Systems?
Sirin Software's primary differentiator is: embedded Linux and SDK work for semiconductor companies, carried through to the consumer app. EPAM Systems's primary differentiator is: publicly listed enterprise vendor that ties IoT data into large data and cloud estates. They also differ in team size (50–249 vs 50,000+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Consumer electronics, Semiconductors vs Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.