DAC.digital
Gdańsk engineering firm combining embedded systems, computer vision and back-end platforms
Founded 2009 | Gdańsk, Poland | 50–249 employees
embedded-firmwareedge-aiiot-cloudweb-dashboardsiiot
What is DAC.digital?
DAC.digital has been based in Gdańsk since 2009, and directories put its team somewhere between 50 and 250 people. Its profiles describe work across embedded systems, IoT, computer vision and the back-end platforms that collect device data. For IoT app buyers the appeal is the mix of edge processing and cloud work in one EU-based team. Consumer mobile design is less visible in its public portfolio than industrial and data work.
DAC.digital works primarily with clients in Industrial manufacturing, Energy, Healthcare, Logistics sectors. Its primary differentiator is: Embedded and computer vision skills paired with back-end platform work in Poland.
DAC.digital tech stack and services
Embedded C/C++PythonOpenCVAWSAzureDockerKubernetes
| Service area |
|---|
| Embedded Firmware |
| Edge AI |
| IoT Cloud Back End |
| Web Dashboards |
| Industrial IoT |
DAC.digital pricing
Short answer: DAC.digital uses a time and materials, dedicated team pricing approach. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed; a discovery call is required.
| Engagement model | Typical range | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Dedicated team | Variable; depends on team size | Large programmes or team augmentation |
| Time and materials | Variable; depends on team size | Large programmes or team augmentation |
| Team extension | Variable; depends on team size | Large programmes or team augmentation |
DAC.digital does not publish a public rate card. Contact them directly via their website to get project-specific pricing.
DAC.digital pros and cons
| Advantages | Things to consider |
|---|---|
| +Edge computer vision experience suits camera-based monitoring products | -Consumer-facing mobile app work is not prominent in its portfolio |
| +Poland-based delivery inside the EU | -Headcount estimates span a wide range across directories |
| +Covers device firmware and the cloud platform behind the app | -Smaller brand recognition outside Poland and Scandinavia |
DAC.digital vs alternatives
How DAC.digital compares to the other top IoT App Development companies.
| Company | Best for | Key difference | Rating | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lemberg Solutions | Connected products needing device, cloud and app from... | Electrical engineering, firmware, cloud and mobile apps delivered by one team with its own hardware lab | 4.8 | Full comparison |
| Softeq | US companies building custom hardware with native apps. | A US-headquartered vendor that designs the circuit board and the app that controls it | 4.6 | Full comparison |
| Indeema Software | Startups and mid-market firms wanting an IoT-only vendor. | IoT and embedded work make up the whole business, with no unrelated agency services alongside | 4.5 | Full comparison |
| Cardinal Peak | US buyers of audio, video and connected consumer... | Two decades of US-based product engineering with media and signal-processing depth | 4.5 | Full comparison |
| KaaIoT Technologies | Fast IoT launches on a ready-made platform. | Owns its IoT platform, so device management and dashboards start from working modules instead of a blank repo | 4.4 | Full comparison |
| Sirin Software | Device startups needing Linux firmware plus a companion... | Embedded Linux and SDK work for semiconductor companies, carried through to the consumer app | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Yalantis | Consumer IoT products where app UX decides adoption. | Long mobile-app history combined with a newly expanded hardware and embedded practice | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| eInfochips | Large OEM programmes needing scale and component supply. | Arrow ownership links engineering services to component sourcing and supply chain | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Intellias | Connected-vehicle, fleet and mobility apps. | Two decades of automotive and navigation software for large car-industry clients | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Zühlke | Regulated medtech and industrial device programmes in Europe. | More than 50 years of product engineering with a strong regulated-industry record | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Witekio | Device-side Linux, Android and OTA for IoT products. | Embedded Linux and device Android specialists backed by Avnet's distribution business | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| SumatoSoft | App and dashboard builds on off-the-shelf sensors. | Focused on the app and cloud side of IoT, with a US contracting entity | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Cogniteq | BLE companion apps for existing hardware. | Mobile-first IoT vendor with EU headquarters and moderate rates | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Spyrosoft | Automotive HMI and industrial IoT with Polish delivery. | Large Polish embedded and automotive bench assembled quickly through organic growth and acquisitions | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| MobiDev | App-heavy IoT products with AI or AR features. | Mobile and web development history plus applied AI and AR work for connected products | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Eastern Peak | Startup IoT MVPs on a limited budget. | UK contracting with Ukrainian delivery rates for startup-sized IoT app builds | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Krasamo | North American OEMs wanting nearshore IoT app teams. | US consultancy with Mexico and Panama delivery working in American time zones | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Sigma Software | Nordic buyers wanting a large Swedish-owned partner. | Swedish group ownership with large Eastern European engineering capacity | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| ArcTouch | Consumer brands wanting design-led companion apps. | Design-first mobile studio for consumer connected products | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Apriorit | Security-sensitive IoT devices and their apps. | Kernel, driver and cybersecurity depth applied to connected devices | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Infinum | Appliance makers consolidating several device apps. | Product design agency with a shipped multi-appliance IoT app for a global brand | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| GlobalLogic | Enterprises with large, long-running connected programmes. | Hitachi backing and very large engineering capacity for enterprise device programmes | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| EPAM Systems | Fortune 500 firms adding IoT to enterprise systems. | Publicly listed enterprise vendor that ties IoT data into large data and cloud estates | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| N-iX | Long-term dedicated IoT teams in Eastern Europe. | Large dedicated-team model with embedded, data and cloud engineers | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| SoftServe | Enterprise cloud-centric IoT and digital twins. | Large cloud consulting practice extending into IoT, robotics and digital twins | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| ELEKS | Turning device data into business apps. | Data science and enterprise app skills applied to IoT data | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| ScienceSoft | Companies wanting IoT from an established IT generalist. | Three decades of IT consulting with an IoT line inside a wide service catalogue | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Itransition | Enterprise IoT platform integration from a generalist. | Enterprise integration experience applied to IoT platforms | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Intellectsoft | Enterprise app modernisation with some IoT. | General digital agency that adds IoT integration to broader app projects | 3.7 | Full comparison |
DAC.digital FAQ
What is DAC.digital?
Gdańsk engineering firm combining embedded systems, computer vision and back-end platforms
How much does DAC.digital charge?
DAC.digital uses time and materials, dedicated team pricing. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. A discovery call is required to get project-specific quotes.
What tech stack does DAC.digital use?
DAC.digital works with Embedded C/C++, Python, OpenCV, AWS, Azure, Docker, Kubernetes. Primary industries served include Industrial manufacturing, Energy, Healthcare, Logistics.
Is DAC.digital right for enterprise?
EU industrial IoT with edge computer vision. 50–249 team size. Key consideration: Consumer-facing mobile app work is not prominent in its portfolio.
What are the best DAC.digital alternatives?
The best alternatives to DAC.digital depend on your use case. Top options are:
- Lemberg Solutions: electrical engineering, firmware, cloud and mobile apps delivered by one team with its own hardware lab
- Softeq: a us-headquartered vendor that designs the circuit board and the app that controls it
- Indeema Software: iot and embedded work make up the whole business, with no unrelated agency services alongside
Compare DAC.digital with other IoT App Development companies
DAC.digital vs Lemberg Solutions DAC.digital vs Softeq DAC.digital vs Indeema Software DAC.digital vs Cardinal Peak DAC.digital vs KaaIoT Technologies DAC.digital vs Sirin Software DAC.digital vs Yalantis DAC.digital vs eInfochips DAC.digital vs Intellias DAC.digital vs Zühlke DAC.digital vs Witekio DAC.digital vs SumatoSoft DAC.digital vs Cogniteq DAC.digital vs Spyrosoft DAC.digital vs MobiDev DAC.digital vs Eastern Peak DAC.digital vs Krasamo DAC.digital vs Sigma Software DAC.digital vs ArcTouch DAC.digital vs Apriorit DAC.digital vs Infinum DAC.digital vs GlobalLogic DAC.digital vs EPAM Systems DAC.digital vs N-iX DAC.digital vs SoftServe DAC.digital vs ELEKS DAC.digital vs ScienceSoft DAC.digital vs Itransition DAC.digital vs Intellectsoft
Verify all details directly with DAC.digital before making a decision.