Lemberg Solutions vs Softeq: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of Softeq (4.6/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for connected products needing device, cloud and app from one vendor. Softeq is the stronger option for US companies building custom hardware with native apps. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Softeq: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Softeq |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 1997 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Houston, Texas, USA (offices in Germany, Mexico and Lithuania) |
| Team size | 200+ | 250–999 |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.6 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Electrical engineering, firmware, cloud and mobile apps delivered by one team with its own hardware lab | A US-headquartered vendor that designs the circuit board and the app that controls it |
| Pricing model | Fixed price, time and materials, dedicated team | Fixed price, time and materials |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | AWS, Azure, Google Cloud | AWS, Azure, Embedded Linux |
| Industries served | Healthcare, Automotive, Energy, Transportation and logistics, Agritech, Consumer electronics, Industrial IoT | Consumer electronics, Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Energy, Smart home |
Lemberg Solutions vs Softeq: overview
Lemberg Solutions
An IoT app is only as reliable as the firmware and cloud it talks to, and Lemberg Solutions is one of the few vendors on this list that builds all three in-house. Founded in 2007, the company has 200+ employees and offices in Lviv, Hamburg, London and Kraków. Its IoT work covers consulting, cloud architecture with device management and OTA updates, iOS, Android and web apps, embedded software, PCB design and prototyping, all backed by an in-house lab. Named clients include Astronics, Caltech, Speede, Ferno, Cellink and Bosch Rexroth, and the published case studies include telemetry for Voltfang's energy storage systems and control software for a 360 kW EV charging station.
Softeq
Softeq has been building software in Houston since 1997, and over the years its work shifted from web projects toward connected hardware. Today it designs electronics, writes drivers and firmware, and builds the native iOS and Android apps and cloud services that sit on top. One public client review describes Softeq delivering proprietary hardware, firmware and native apps for an industrial lighting company that let users control fixtures from a phone. Clutch lists the team at 250 to 999 people, with offices in Germany, Mexico and Lithuania alongside Houston.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Softeq
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Softeq |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile companion apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web dashboards and portals | ✓ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud back end | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded firmware | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hardware design | ✓ | ✓ |
| Edge AI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Softeq
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Softeq |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| BLE | N/A | ✓ |
| MQTT | N/A | N/A |
| Swift | N/A | ✓ |
| Kotlin | N/A | ✓ |
| Flutter | N/A | N/A |
| React Native | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Softeq
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Softeq |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Team extension, Time and materials | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Softeq
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Softeq |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare, Automotive, Energy | Consumer electronics, Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | Building an iOS and Android app together with the firmware and cloud for a new connected device., Adding remote monitoring, OTA updates and telemetry to an existing industrial or energy product. | Developing a connected industrial product where hardware, firmware and app ship together., Building BLE or Wi-Fi control apps for lighting, HVAC or other building equipment. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Lemberg Solutions vs Softeq: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | One team owns the firmware, cloud back end and companion app, so protocol changes on the device side do not break the app silently |
| + | ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certified, with ISO 13485 listed for medical device work |
| + | Partnerships with semiconductor vendors including NXP, Microchip and STMicroelectronics help with chip selection and board support |
| + | Edge AI and computer vision experience, from sensor integration to on-device inference |
| + | All intellectual property transfers to the client |
| + | An in-house lab lets the team test apps against real prototypes instead of simulators |
| - | Mass production is not handled in-house, so you need a separate contract manufacturer for volume builds |
| - | The company does not obtain regulatory certification on the client's behalf; it supplies documentation and engineering support for approvals |
| - | A team built for hardware-to-cloud projects is more than you need for a simple app on top of an existing, stable device API |
| Softeq | |
|---|---|
| + | Hardware design, driver work and app development are all in-house |
| + | US headquarters and contracts suit buyers who need a domestic legal counterparty |
| + | Nearly three decades of delivery history gives it more reference projects than most mid-sized firms |
| + | Public client reviews credit its mobile and back-end work on connected products specifically |
| - | US-led project management means rates sit above the Eastern European specialists on this list |
| - | Pricing and minimum project size are not published |
| - | Breadth across AI, web and enterprise software means IoT is one practice among several |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: building an iOS and Android app together with the firmware and cloud for a new connected device.
Electrical engineering, firmware, cloud and mobile apps delivered by one team with its own hardware lab. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Automotive, Energy, Transportation and logistics, Agritech, Consumer electronics, Industrial IoT.
Who should choose Softeq?
A typical fit: developing a connected industrial product where hardware, firmware and app ship together.
A US-headquartered vendor that designs the circuit board and the app that controls it. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Energy, Smart home.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Softeq
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Lemberg Solutions |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Softeq (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Softeq
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Softeq fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Building an iOS and Android app together with the firmware and cloud for a new connected device. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Adding remote monitoring, OTA updates and telemetry to an existing industrial or energy product. | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Developing a connected industrial product where hardware, firmware and app ship together. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Building BLE or Wi-Fi control apps for lighting, HVAC or other building equipment. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price MVP app | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Long-term dedicated team | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Softeq
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT App Development projects. Electrical engineering, firmware, cloud and mobile apps delivered by one team with its own hardware lab.
Softeq (4.6/5) is worth a look if you need building BLE or Wi-Fi control apps for lighting, HVAC or other building equipment. If your situation matches that, Softeq is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Softeq FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Softeq?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: one team owns the firmware, cloud back end and companion app, so protocol changes on the device side do not break the app silently. Softeq's strongest advantage: hardware design, driver work and app development are all in-house.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Softeq differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses fixed price, time and materials, dedicated team pricing. Softeq uses fixed price, time and materials pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Softeq?
Softeq is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Softeq?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: electrical engineering, firmware, cloud and mobile apps delivered by one team with its own hardware lab. Softeq's primary differentiator is: a US-headquartered vendor that designs the circuit board and the app that controls it. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 250–999), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare, Automotive vs Consumer electronics, Industrial manufacturing).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.