eInfochips vs SumatoSoft: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
eInfochips (4.3/5) edges ahead of SumatoSoft (4.2/5) overall. eInfochips is the better choice for large OEM programmes needing scale and component supply. SumatoSoft is the stronger option for app and dashboard builds on off-the-shelf sensors. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
eInfochips vs SumatoSoft: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | eInfochips | SumatoSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1994 | 2012 |
| HQ | San Jose, California, USA (engineering HQ: Ahmedabad, India) | Boston, MA, USA |
| Team size | 1,000–5,000 | 51–200 |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Arrow ownership links engineering services to component sourcing and supply chain | Focused on the app and cloud side of IoT, with a US contracting entity |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price | Fixed price, time and materials |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | AWS IoT, Azure IoT, Embedded Linux | AWS IoT, Azure IoT, Ruby on Rails |
| Industries served | Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Automotive, Consumer electronics, Semiconductors | Logistics, Retail, Healthcare, Industrial manufacturing |
eInfochips vs SumatoSoft: overview
eInfochips
eInfochips was founded in 1994 and became part of Arrow Electronics in January 2018. The company now lists San Jose as headquarters, while most of its engineers work in Ahmedabad and other Indian centres; estimates put the team between about 3,500 and 4,000. It covers silicon, hardware, firmware, cloud and mobile apps, and its tie to Arrow gives clients a direct line into component supply. Few other vendors here can staff a 50-engineer IoT programme on short notice.
SumatoSoft
SumatoSoft was founded in 2012 and has its headquarters at One Boston Place, with directory headcounts of 51 to 200. IoT is one of its named practices, alongside custom web and mobile development, and its published work centres on monitoring apps, asset tracking and the web dashboards that sit behind them. It does not design hardware, so it suits projects where the devices already exist or come from a hardware partner. It is a sensible mid-budget pick for app and cloud work on top of off-the-shelf sensors.
Services and capabilities: eInfochips vs SumatoSoft
| Capability | eInfochips | SumatoSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile companion apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web dashboards and portals | ✓ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud back end | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded firmware | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware design | ✓ | ✗ |
| Edge AI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: eInfochips vs SumatoSoft
| Framework / platform | eInfochips | SumatoSoft |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| MQTT | N/A | ✓ |
| Swift | N/A | N/A |
| Kotlin | N/A | N/A |
| Flutter | N/A | N/A |
| React Native | N/A | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: eInfochips vs SumatoSoft
| Criterion | eInfochips | SumatoSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Time and materials, Fixed project | Fixed project, Time and materials, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: eInfochips vs SumatoSoft
| Dimension | eInfochips | SumatoSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Mid-market to enterprise | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Automotive | Logistics, Retail, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | Staffing a large OEM's multi-device IoT platform with app and cloud teams., Building industrial gateways and their management apps for global rollout. | Building an asset tracking web and mobile app on commercial GPS trackers., Creating an environmental monitoring dashboard for off-the-shelf sensors. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
eInfochips vs SumatoSoft: pros and cons
| eInfochips | |
|---|---|
| + | Can staff very large programmes quickly |
| + | Arrow ownership helps with chip availability, reference designs and supply planning |
| + | Covers the full chain from chip-level work to cloud and app |
| + | Indian delivery keeps blended rates competitive for big teams |
| - | Owned by Arrow Electronics since 2018, which may steer component recommendations toward Arrow's line card |
| - | Large-company process can feel slow for a startup MVP |
| - | Founding year is given as 1994 or 1995 depending on the source |
| SumatoSoft | |
|---|---|
| + | US legal entity with lower blended rates than US-only engineering firms |
| + | Strong on web dashboards and admin tools that IoT products often neglect |
| + | Clear fit for monitoring and tracking apps on commercial hardware |
| - | No hardware design or deep firmware practice |
| - | IoT is one practice among several general software services |
| - | Older directory listings give conflicting founding details |
Who should choose eInfochips?
A typical fit: staffing a large OEM's multi-device IoT platform with app and cloud teams.
Arrow ownership links engineering services to component sourcing and supply chain. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Automotive, Consumer electronics, Semiconductors.
Who should choose SumatoSoft?
A typical fit: building an asset tracking web and mobile app on commercial GPS trackers.
Focused on the app and cloud side of IoT, with a US contracting entity. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Logistics, Retail, Healthcare, Industrial manufacturing.
Decision matrix: eInfochips vs SumatoSoft
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | eInfochips |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | eInfochips |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: eInfochips (Not published) vs SumatoSoft (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | eInfochips |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | eInfochips |
Use case fit: eInfochips vs SumatoSoft
| Use case | eInfochips fit | SumatoSoft fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Staffing a large OEM's multi-device IoT platform with app and cloud teams. | Strong | Limited | eInfochips |
| Building industrial gateways and their management apps for global rollout. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Building an asset tracking web and mobile app on commercial GPS trackers. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Creating an environmental monitoring dashboard for off-the-shelf sensors. | Limited | Strong | SumatoSoft |
| Fixed-price MVP app | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Long-term dedicated team | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: eInfochips vs SumatoSoft
eInfochips (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT App Development projects. Arrow ownership links engineering services to component sourcing and supply chain.
SumatoSoft (4.2/5) is worth a look if you need creating an environmental monitoring dashboard for off-the-shelf sensors. If your situation matches that, SumatoSoft is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
eInfochips vs SumatoSoft FAQ
Is eInfochips better than SumatoSoft?
eInfochips (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. eInfochips's strongest advantage: can staff very large programmes quickly. SumatoSoft's strongest advantage: US legal entity with lower blended rates than US-only engineering firms.
How do eInfochips and SumatoSoft differ in pricing?
eInfochips uses time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price pricing. SumatoSoft uses fixed price, time and materials pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: eInfochips or SumatoSoft?
eInfochips is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between eInfochips and SumatoSoft?
eInfochips's primary differentiator is: arrow ownership links engineering services to component sourcing and supply chain. SumatoSoft's primary differentiator is: focused on the app and cloud side of IoT, with a US contracting entity. They also differ in team size (1,000–5,000 vs 51–200), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare vs Logistics, Retail).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.