eInfochips vs ScienceSoft: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
eInfochips (4.3/5) edges ahead of ScienceSoft (3.8/5) overall. eInfochips is the better choice for large OEM programmes needing scale and component supply. ScienceSoft is the stronger option for companies wanting IoT from an established IT generalist. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
eInfochips vs ScienceSoft: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | eInfochips | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1994 | 1989 |
| HQ | San Jose, California, USA (engineering HQ: Ahmedabad, India) | McKinney, Texas, USA |
| Team size | 1,000–5,000 | 750+ |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Arrow ownership links engineering services to component sourcing and supply chain | Three decades of IT consulting with an IoT line inside a wide service catalogue |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price | Fixed price, time and materials |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | AWS IoT, Azure IoT, Embedded Linux | Azure IoT, AWS IoT, .NET |
| Industries served | Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Automotive, Consumer electronics, Semiconductors | Healthcare, Industrial manufacturing, Retail, Logistics |
eInfochips vs ScienceSoft: overview
eInfochips
eInfochips was founded in 1994 and became part of Arrow Electronics in January 2018. The company now lists San Jose as headquarters, while most of its engineers work in Ahmedabad and other Indian centres; estimates put the team between about 3,500 and 4,000. It covers silicon, hardware, firmware, cloud and mobile apps, and its tie to Arrow gives clients a direct line into component supply. Few other vendors here can staff a 50-engineer IoT programme on short notice.
ScienceSoft
ScienceSoft dates to 1989 and is headquartered in McKinney, Texas, with about 750 employees. It publishes a large amount of IoT material and offers IoT consulting, app development and cloud back ends as one of many service lines. Its broad experience and ISO certifications suit buyers who want a stable generalist. Specialist device engineering is not its strength.
Services and capabilities: eInfochips vs ScienceSoft
| Capability | eInfochips | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile companion apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web dashboards and portals | ✓ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud back end | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded firmware | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware design | ✓ | ✗ |
| Edge AI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: eInfochips vs ScienceSoft
| Framework / platform | eInfochips | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| MQTT | N/A | N/A |
| Swift | N/A | N/A |
| Kotlin | N/A | N/A |
| Flutter | N/A | N/A |
| React Native | N/A | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: eInfochips vs ScienceSoft
| Criterion | eInfochips | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Time and materials, Fixed project | Fixed project, Time and materials, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: eInfochips vs ScienceSoft
| Dimension | eInfochips | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Mid-market to enterprise | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Automotive | Healthcare, Industrial manufacturing, Retail |
| Best use cases | Staffing a large OEM's multi-device IoT platform with app and cloud teams., Building industrial gateways and their management apps for global rollout. | Building a remote patient monitoring app on commercial devices., Adding IoT data to an existing enterprise app the vendor already supports. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
eInfochips vs ScienceSoft: pros and cons
| eInfochips | |
|---|---|
| + | Can staff very large programmes quickly |
| + | Arrow ownership helps with chip availability, reference designs and supply planning |
| + | Covers the full chain from chip-level work to cloud and app |
| + | Indian delivery keeps blended rates competitive for big teams |
| - | Owned by Arrow Electronics since 2018, which may steer component recommendations toward Arrow's line card |
| - | Large-company process can feel slow for a startup MVP |
| - | Founding year is given as 1994 or 1995 depending on the source |
| ScienceSoft | |
|---|---|
| + | Long track record and stable company history |
| + | ISO 9001 and ISO 27001 certified (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| + | Can handle IoT alongside other enterprise IT needs |
| - | Heavy content marketing overstates how specialised its IoT practice is |
| - | No hardware design |
| - | IoT is one of dozens of service lines |
Who should choose eInfochips?
A typical fit: staffing a large OEM's multi-device IoT platform with app and cloud teams.
Arrow ownership links engineering services to component sourcing and supply chain. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Automotive, Consumer electronics, Semiconductors.
Who should choose ScienceSoft?
A typical fit: building a remote patient monitoring app on commercial devices.
Three decades of IT consulting with an IoT line inside a wide service catalogue. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Industrial manufacturing, Retail, Logistics.
Decision matrix: eInfochips vs ScienceSoft
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | eInfochips |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | eInfochips |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: eInfochips (Not published) vs ScienceSoft (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | eInfochips |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | eInfochips |
Use case fit: eInfochips vs ScienceSoft
| Use case | eInfochips fit | ScienceSoft fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Staffing a large OEM's multi-device IoT platform with app and cloud teams. | Strong | Limited | eInfochips |
| Building industrial gateways and their management apps for global rollout. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Building a remote patient monitoring app on commercial devices. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Adding IoT data to an existing enterprise app the vendor already supports. | Limited | Strong | ScienceSoft |
| Fixed-price MVP app | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Long-term dedicated team | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: eInfochips vs ScienceSoft
eInfochips (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT App Development projects. Arrow ownership links engineering services to component sourcing and supply chain.
ScienceSoft (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need adding IoT data to an existing enterprise app the vendor already supports. If your situation matches that, ScienceSoft is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
eInfochips vs ScienceSoft FAQ
Is eInfochips better than ScienceSoft?
eInfochips (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. eInfochips's strongest advantage: can staff very large programmes quickly. ScienceSoft's strongest advantage: long track record and stable company history.
How do eInfochips and ScienceSoft differ in pricing?
eInfochips uses time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price pricing. ScienceSoft uses fixed price, time and materials pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: eInfochips or ScienceSoft?
eInfochips is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between eInfochips and ScienceSoft?
eInfochips's primary differentiator is: arrow ownership links engineering services to component sourcing and supply chain. ScienceSoft's primary differentiator is: three decades of IT consulting with an IoT line inside a wide service catalogue. They also differ in team size (1,000–5,000 vs 750+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare vs Healthcare, Industrial manufacturing).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.