eInfochips vs EPAM Systems: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
eInfochips (4.3/5) edges ahead of EPAM Systems (3.9/5) overall. eInfochips is the better choice for large OEM programmes needing scale and component supply. EPAM Systems is the stronger option for fortune 500 firms adding IoT to enterprise systems. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
eInfochips vs EPAM Systems: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | eInfochips | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1994 | 1993 |
| HQ | San Jose, California, USA (engineering HQ: Ahmedabad, India) | Newtown, Pennsylvania, USA |
| Team size | 1,000–5,000 | 50,000+ |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Arrow ownership links engineering services to component sourcing and supply chain | Publicly listed enterprise vendor that ties IoT data into large data and cloud estates |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price | Time and materials, dedicated team, managed services |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | AWS IoT, Azure IoT, Embedded Linux | AWS, Azure, Google Cloud |
| Industries served | Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Automotive, Consumer electronics, Semiconductors | Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Retail, Financial services, Energy |
eInfochips vs EPAM Systems: overview
eInfochips
eInfochips was founded in 1994 and became part of Arrow Electronics in January 2018. The company now lists San Jose as headquarters, while most of its engineers work in Ahmedabad and other Indian centres; estimates put the team between about 3,500 and 4,000. It covers silicon, hardware, firmware, cloud and mobile apps, and its tie to Arrow gives clients a direct line into component supply. Few other vendors here can staff a 50-engineer IoT programme on short notice.
EPAM Systems
EPAM was founded in 1993 and is headquartered in Newtown, Pennsylvania, with more than 50,000 staff. It is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and works mostly for large enterprises. Connected-product and industrial IoT work happens inside its broader engineering, data and cloud practices. Its scale and compliance are real advantages, but IoT apps are a narrow slice of what it does.
Services and capabilities: eInfochips vs EPAM Systems
| Capability | eInfochips | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile companion apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web dashboards and portals | ✓ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud back end | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded firmware | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware design | ✓ | ✗ |
| Edge AI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: eInfochips vs EPAM Systems
| Framework / platform | eInfochips | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| MQTT | N/A | N/A |
| Swift | N/A | N/A |
| Kotlin | N/A | N/A |
| Flutter | N/A | N/A |
| React Native | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: eInfochips vs EPAM Systems
| Criterion | eInfochips | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Time and materials, Fixed project | Dedicated team, Time and materials, Managed services |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: eInfochips vs EPAM Systems
| Dimension | eInfochips | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Mid-market to enterprise | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Automotive | Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Retail |
| Best use cases | Staffing a large OEM's multi-device IoT platform with app and cloud teams., Building industrial gateways and their management apps for global rollout. | Connecting factory telemetry to an enterprise data platform., Building internal apps that use device data across a large company. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
eInfochips vs EPAM Systems: pros and cons
| eInfochips | |
|---|---|
| + | Can staff very large programmes quickly |
| + | Arrow ownership helps with chip availability, reference designs and supply planning |
| + | Covers the full chain from chip-level work to cloud and app |
| + | Indian delivery keeps blended rates competitive for big teams |
| - | Owned by Arrow Electronics since 2018, which may steer component recommendations toward Arrow's line card |
| - | Large-company process can feel slow for a startup MVP |
| - | Founding year is given as 1994 or 1995 depending on the source |
| EPAM Systems | |
|---|---|
| + | Public-company governance and financial reporting |
| + | Strong data engineering for analysing large telemetry volumes |
| + | Global delivery footprint |
| - | IoT app development is a small part of a broad enterprise portfolio |
| - | Little hardware or firmware work |
| - | Pricing and process are built for large enterprises and rarely fit startup budgets |
Who should choose eInfochips?
A typical fit: staffing a large OEM's multi-device IoT platform with app and cloud teams.
Arrow ownership links engineering services to component sourcing and supply chain. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Automotive, Consumer electronics, Semiconductors.
Who should choose EPAM Systems?
A typical fit: connecting factory telemetry to an enterprise data platform.
Publicly listed enterprise vendor that ties IoT data into large data and cloud estates. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare, Retail, Financial services, Energy.
Decision matrix: eInfochips vs EPAM Systems
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | eInfochips |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | eInfochips |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: eInfochips (Not published) vs EPAM Systems (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | eInfochips |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | eInfochips |
Use case fit: eInfochips vs EPAM Systems
| Use case | eInfochips fit | EPAM Systems fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Staffing a large OEM's multi-device IoT platform with app and cloud teams. | Strong | Limited | eInfochips |
| Building industrial gateways and their management apps for global rollout. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Connecting factory telemetry to an enterprise data platform. | Limited | Strong | EPAM Systems |
| Building internal apps that use device data across a large company. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price MVP app | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Long-term dedicated team | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: eInfochips vs EPAM Systems
eInfochips (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT App Development projects. Arrow ownership links engineering services to component sourcing and supply chain.
EPAM Systems (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need building internal apps that use device data across a large company. If your situation matches that, EPAM Systems is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
eInfochips vs EPAM Systems FAQ
Is eInfochips better than EPAM Systems?
eInfochips (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. eInfochips's strongest advantage: can staff very large programmes quickly. EPAM Systems's strongest advantage: public-company governance and financial reporting.
How do eInfochips and EPAM Systems differ in pricing?
eInfochips uses time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price pricing. EPAM Systems uses time and materials, dedicated team, managed services pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: eInfochips or EPAM Systems?
eInfochips is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between eInfochips and EPAM Systems?
eInfochips's primary differentiator is: arrow ownership links engineering services to component sourcing and supply chain. EPAM Systems's primary differentiator is: publicly listed enterprise vendor that ties IoT data into large data and cloud estates. They also differ in team size (1,000–5,000 vs 50,000+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare vs Industrial manufacturing, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.