Cogniteq vs Krasamo: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Cogniteq (4.1/5) edges ahead of Krasamo (4.0/5) overall. Cogniteq is the better choice for BLE companion apps for existing hardware. Krasamo is the stronger option for north American OEMs wanting nearshore IoT app teams. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Cogniteq vs Krasamo: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Cogniteq | Krasamo |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2005 | 2010 |
| HQ | Vilnius, Lithuania | Plano, Texas, USA (offices in Mexico and Panama) |
| Team size | 51–200 | 50–249 |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Mobile-first IoT vendor with EU headquarters and moderate rates | US consultancy with Mexico and Panama delivery working in American time zones |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price | Time and materials, fixed price |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | BLE, Swift, Kotlin | Swift, Kotlin, Flutter |
| Industries served | Smart home, Healthcare, Consumer electronics, Logistics | Smart home, Consumer electronics, Industrial manufacturing, Retail |
Cogniteq vs Krasamo: overview
Cogniteq
Cogniteq is headquartered in Vilnius and most sources date it to 2005. It describes itself as a custom software company specialising in IoT and mobile solutions, and its portfolio includes BLE device apps, smart home control and telemetry back ends. Team size estimates run from about 80 in-house employees to the 200+ developers claimed on its blog (per company website; independently unverifiable). It is best for app and cloud work where a hardware team already exists.
Krasamo
Krasamo was founded in 2010 and works from Plano, Texas, with nearshore offices in Aguascalientes, Mexico and Panama. Craft describes it as an enterprise consultancy focused on IoT and digital modernisation, and a Clutch project listing covers IoT app development for a home security manufacturer. Team estimates vary from about two dozen to 249 depending on the directory. It suits North American buyers who want same-time-zone nearshore delivery.
Services and capabilities: Cogniteq vs Krasamo
| Capability | Cogniteq | Krasamo |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile companion apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web dashboards and portals | ✓ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud back end | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded firmware | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware design | ✗ | ✗ |
| Edge AI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Cogniteq vs Krasamo
| Framework / platform | Cogniteq | Krasamo |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | ✓ | N/A |
| MQTT | ✓ | N/A |
| Swift | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kotlin | ✓ | ✓ |
| Flutter | ✓ | ✓ |
| React Native | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Cogniteq vs Krasamo
| Criterion | Cogniteq | Krasamo |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time and materials, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Time and materials, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Cogniteq vs Krasamo
| Dimension | Cogniteq | Krasamo |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Smart home, Healthcare, Consumer electronics | Smart home, Consumer electronics, Industrial manufacturing |
| Best use cases | Building a BLE companion app for a wearable or home device., Developing a smart home control app with cloud sync. | Building a mobile app for a home security or appliance manufacturer., Adding Matter or cloud-to-cloud integrations to a consumer device app. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Cogniteq vs Krasamo: pros and cons
| Cogniteq | |
|---|---|
| + | Companion-app and BLE experience is the core of its IoT portfolio |
| + | Lithuanian headquarters places contracts inside the EU |
| + | Mid-sized team gives senior attention on smaller projects |
| - | Limited hardware design capability |
| - | Its own blog publishes IoT company rankings that include itself, so its marketing claims need checking |
| - | Team size claims are inconsistent across sources |
| Krasamo | |
|---|---|
| + | Nearshore teams share working hours with US clients |
| + | Appliance and home security app work fits consumer device makers |
| + | Consulting focus helps with product planning before build |
| - | Small team by some estimates, with inconsistent public headcount |
| - | Limited firmware and hardware capability |
| - | Fewer public case studies than larger vendors |
Who should choose Cogniteq?
A typical fit: building a BLE companion app for a wearable or home device.
Mobile-first IoT vendor with EU headquarters and moderate rates. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Smart home, Healthcare, Consumer electronics, Logistics.
Who should choose Krasamo?
A typical fit: building a mobile app for a home security or appliance manufacturer.
US consultancy with Mexico and Panama delivery working in American time zones. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Smart home, Consumer electronics, Industrial manufacturing, Retail.
Decision matrix: Cogniteq vs Krasamo
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Cogniteq |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Cogniteq |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Cogniteq (Not published) vs Krasamo (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Cogniteq |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Krasamo |
Use case fit: Cogniteq vs Krasamo
| Use case | Cogniteq fit | Krasamo fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Building a BLE companion app for a wearable or home device. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Developing a smart home control app with cloud sync. | Strong | Limited | Cogniteq |
| Building a mobile app for a home security or appliance manufacturer. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Adding Matter or cloud-to-cloud integrations to a consumer device app. | Limited | Strong | Krasamo |
| Fixed-price MVP app | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Long-term dedicated team | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Cogniteq vs Krasamo
Cogniteq (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT App Development projects. Mobile-first IoT vendor with EU headquarters and moderate rates.
Krasamo (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need adding Matter or cloud-to-cloud integrations to a consumer device app. If your situation matches that, Krasamo is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Cogniteq vs Krasamo FAQ
Is Cogniteq better than Krasamo?
Cogniteq (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Cogniteq's strongest advantage: companion-app and BLE experience is the core of its IoT portfolio. Krasamo's strongest advantage: nearshore teams share working hours with US clients.
How do Cogniteq and Krasamo differ in pricing?
Cogniteq uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. Krasamo uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Cogniteq or Krasamo?
Cogniteq is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Cogniteq and Krasamo?
Cogniteq's primary differentiator is: mobile-first IoT vendor with EU headquarters and moderate rates. Krasamo's primary differentiator is: US consultancy with Mexico and Panama delivery working in American time zones. They also differ in team size (51–200 vs 50–249), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Smart home, Healthcare vs Smart home, Consumer electronics).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.